<span>Men and women interact differently through conversations with friends and significant others. Men use conversation to establish their status with others, rarely to talk about feelings and more personal issues. Women use socialization to build intimate relationships with friends and lovers. They feel that when you discuss your troubles with a friend and they reciprocate you become closer.</span>
Answer:
normative
Explanation:
A crime which is against or violates the cultural standards or the prevailing norms can be termed as the normative definition of crime. In other words, crime which is offends a set of norms such as moral codes is called as the normative crime.
Thus prostitution can be considered as a normative crime in some places where it is against the moral characteristics of the society. Whereas in some places, prostitution is acceptable.
Thus this explains why prostitution is legal in Nevada while it is illegal in Clark County.
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review, by which the federal courts could declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution (“unconstitutional”) and therefore null and void.
Three reasons:
- Genes biologically determine specific apparent traits ( phenotype).
- A genotype which is formed by the genes ( parent to offspring) predetermines the physical traits ( phenotype) .
- DNA which is also genotype is the reason a person is who they are as far as generic traits inherited which always lead to physical abilities.
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
