Hello !
Answer :
The Fisher formula is expressed as 1+R = (1 + r) x (1+ h) where R is the nominal rate, r is the real rate, and h is the inflation rate.
Answer:
Employee satisfaction is likely to be lower
Explanation:
Promotion opportunities are an important form of reward inside an organization. If there are no promotion opportunities in place, this means that employee satisfaction will likely be lower, because there one incentive less to work hard: the incentive of being promoted.
Answer:
option (c) $600
Explanation:
Given:
Tax = $4 per unit
Initial equilibrium quantity = 2,000 units
Final equilibrium quantity = 1,700 units
Decrease in consumer surplus = $3,000
Decrease in consumer surplus = $4,400
Now,
Deadweight Loss is calculated using the formula:
Deadweight loss
=
× Tax × (Original equilibrium quantity - New equilibrium quantity)
on substituting the respective values, we get
Deadweight loss =
× 4 × (2,000 - 1,700)
or
Deadweight loss = 2 × (3) = $600
Hence,
the correct answer is option (c) $600
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia