NOT NECESSARILY would a triangle be equilateral if one of its angles is 60 degrees. To be an equilateral triangle (a triangle in which all 3 sides have the same length), all 3 angles of the triangle would have to be 60°-angles; however, the triangle could be a 30°-60°-90° right triangle in which the side opposite the 30 degree angle is one-half as long as the hypotenuse, and the length of the side opposite the 60 degree angle is √3/2 as long as the hypotenuse. Another of possibly many examples would be a triangle with angles of 60°, 40°, and 80° which has opposite sides of lengths 2, 1.4845 (rounded to 4 decimal places), and 2.2743 (rounded to 4 decimal places), respectively, the last two of which were determined by using the Law of Sines: "In any triangle ABC, having sides of length a, b, and c, the following relationships are true: a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C."¹
Answer:
−30a−6
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's simplify step-by-step.
−9a−10−6a+7−9a−10−6a+7
=−9a+−10+−6a+7+−9a+−10+−6a+7
Combine Like Terms:
=−9a+−10+−6a+7+−9a+−10+−6a+7
=(−9a+−6a+−9a+−6a)+(−10+7+−10+7)
=−30a+−6
BRAINLIEST. if you don't mind.
The coordinate plane is missing, so i have attached it.
Answer:
Perimeter of room = 140 ft
Area of room = 1200 sq.ft
Step-by-step explanation:
From the cordinate plane attached, we can see the polygon QRST which represents the floor plan of the roo.
Thus;
The length of the sides of the room are;
ST = RQ = 30
QT = RS = 40
Perimeter of a rectangle is the sum of all sides of the rectangle.
Thus, perimeter of the room = (30 × 2) + (40 × 2) = 140 ft
Now, area of a rectangle is the product of two perpendicular sides.
Thus area of room = 40 x 30 = 1200 sq.ft
Well 344 rounded to the nearest hundred is 300 so times 24 its 7,200 add 4 is 7,204 but take away 12 is 7,192 and there's your answer
Answer:
Salamander Trail is longer than Great Oak Trail
Step-by-step explanation:
The given parameters are;
The scale of the map is 36 mi = 6 cm
The length of Great Oak Trail = 4.5 cm
The scale of a different map is 24 mi = 3 cm
The length of Salamander Trail = 3.5 cm
Therefore, we have;
The actual length of Great Oak Trail based on the first map is given as follows;
36 mi = 6 cm
6 cm = 36 mi
1 cm = 36 mi/6 = 6 mi
4.5 cm = 4.5 × 6 mi = 27 mi
The actual length of Salamander Trail based on the second map is given as follows;
24 mi = 3 cm
3 cm = 24 mi
1 cm = 24 mi/3 = 8 mi
3.5 cm = 3.5 × 8 mi = 28 mi
Therefore, Salamander Trail with an actual length of 28 mi is longer than Great Oak Trail which has an actual length of 27 mi.
