Her continued presence is morally acceptable in order to eradicate discrimination and promote equality. She has an ethical obligation to receive respect, be treated equally to other employees in the organization, and be free from harassment.
Discriminating against Hispanics in America is wrong for everyone, not just Hispanics. Professionals also have their own codes of ethics. It is moral to continue the employee's employment if she has a reasonable reason to think that by doing so, she can improve her behavior.
The action is ethical if the employee thinks she can prove it to the AG, EEOC, or law enforcement (as necessary) with enough documentation of the behavior. It might be ethical or it might not, depending on the facts, if the employee is facing a personal dilemma regarding her employability and behavior.
To learn more about ethical obligation here,
brainly.com/question/27824491
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ryotwari system
They had ownership rights, could sell, mortgage or gift the land. The taxes were directly collected by the government from the peasants. The rates were 50% in dryland and 60% in the wetland. The rates were high and unlike the Permanent System, they were open to being increased.
A) All citizens are required to vote. Fun fact: In most countries with compulsory voting, failure to attend and vote can result in fines.
Answer:
do you have any pic please
Explanation:
