Answer:
Decision rule
Reject null hypothesis
Conclusion
There is significance evidence that the true mean is different from 0.86
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean 
The sample is mean is 
The standard deviation is 
The level of significance is 
The sample size n = 3
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as
=> 
=> 
Generally p- value is mathematically represented as
From the z-table
So
=> 
From the obtained question we see that 
Hence we reject the null hypothesis
Answer:
Not possible to calculate with the information
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
(each)
Required
The number of Kansas senators presently in the US senate
First, it should be noted that the given information applies to 2008 presidential election
Next, the given information states the number of electors each of the given locations had in the electoral college.
There was no information about the number of senators in the senate (presently or 2008).
<em>Hence, additional information is required to answer the question.</em>
2d+1/6=2d+6 (I distributed the 6 to what was in the parentheses)
2d-2d=6-1/6 (I subtracted 2d from both sides to get the variables on one side and 1/6 from both sides to get the variables by themselves)
0=35/6 (combined like terms)
0=35/6 is an untrue statement so x doesn't exist
Answer: anwser is D if thats incorrect then its A
Step-by-step explanation:
