Answer:
Option A The impact of a change in the local currency on inflow and outflow variables can sometimes be indirect and therefore different from what is expected.
Explanation:
The reason is that the changes in the currency exchange rate in which the company receives the payment and is also not a home currency, such risk exposure is known as economic exposure. So the only option that correct here is option A.
Option B is incorrect because depreciation is non cash item and it is not exposed to currency fluctuations.
Option C and D are also incorrect because domestic firms don't face any economic exposure.
Strategic alliances are generally meant to increase the business strength. Most of the cooperative strategies aim at drawing upon the individual strengths of partners to be more competitive as a single unified unit.
There are a lot of challenges in getting cooperative strategies to work as envisaged during the planning phases. When corporate companies seek cooperation strategies, the hindsight which comes is that most of them compete against each other).
Hence, it is natural that such companies will seek to fulfill their interests first before considering the interests of their partnerships. Then, some companies seek cooperative partnerships with partners who are already having other collaborators.
It also follows that such cooperation lacks commitment. There is also a lack of detailing the operational structure by which operational strategy will be a great success.
To know more about Strategic alliance here:
brainly.com/question/14014533
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Please check attachment for the solution to the question.
Answer:
He should set a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT).
Explanation:
Mr. Bailey would be the grantor that transfers the asset into the GRAT, but retains the right to receive annuity payments for a number of years. The IRS has set a minimum annuity corresponding to the Section 7520 rate, during the last two years the rate has varied from 2-3%. When the trust expires (pays all the annuities), the beneficiary gets the asset tax free.
Since the grantor is giving up an asset but in exchange is receiving an annuity form it, there is no applicable gift tax, it is called a zeroed-out GRAT.
This type of grant makes sense only if the grantor believes that the future value of the asset will be higher than the current value, since the annuity is based on the current value. In this case, Mr. Bailey would receive payments based on a $200,000 value, but the property's fair market value is already higher and should increase as time passes.
All other member nations will help defend it
