If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
The answer would be D: debit to an asset. Hoped this helped:)
Answer:
Expense & revenue summary a/c (credit balance) = $3500
Explanation:
1. Dr Expense & revenue summary 52500
Cr Sales discount 1500
Cr Sales return & allowance 3000
Cr Depreciation expense 25000
Cr Salaries expense 23000
(Close expenses to expense & revenue summary a/c)
2. Dr Sales 56000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 56000
(Close sales to expense & revenue summary a/c)
3. Dr Expense & revenue summary a/c 3500
Cr Retained earning a/c 3500
(To close expense & revenue summary a/c)
4. Dr Retained earning 2000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 2000
(Close dividend to expense & revenue summary a/c)d
<span>Teamwork is a must necessary for any kind of business setup to grow. Salespeople have to build internal partnerships through teamwork by understanding the other team members and clarifying expectations. Fulfilling the commitments and focusing on little things too also help in achieving the goals. They must attend to the little things if they want to succeed.</span>