Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
Formed by a group of people having common interest
The answer is B) Give a framework for the laws and government of Georgia.
Answer:
probably kashmir
Explanation:
Bcause troops were deployed to Bosnia as well as Afghanistan.
Answer:
A major goal of the <u><em>ecological</em></u> approach to perception is to determine how movement creates perceptual information that both guides further movement and helps observers perceive the environment.
Explanation:
The Ecological Approach is an attempt to understand how the natural factors affect living beings, how living beings interact with these elements and what would be the consequences of it. Then based on this analysis and the results, what path must be taken.
