As per the Anti-Federalists,
- to support the Constitution
- to answer criticisms from the Anti-Federalists describes the purpose of the Federalist Papers
<h3>What are Anti-Federalists?</h3>
Generally, Anti-Federalism was a political movement that began in the late 18th century that opposed the establishment of a more powerful central government in the United States of America.
It also opposed the adoption of the Constitution of 1787. More power was delegated to state governments under the previous constitution, which was referred to as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.
Federalists were those who advocated for a stronger national republic and the Constitution as the governing document of the United States. Anti-Federalists were those who advocated for more decentralized and localized forms of governance and were opposed to the Constitution being ratified.
Read more about Anti-Federalists
brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ1
CQ
Which of these describes the purpose of the Federalist Papers? Select all that apply
to discourage factions
to support the Constitution
to provide safeguards against tyranny
to answer criticisms from the Anti-Federalists
The correct answer is C, as "He" refers to King George III in the passage.
The passage belongs to the accusation of the Declaration of Independence of the United States, and refers to the motives that the settlers had to seek independence from Great Britain.
Relations between the Thirteen Colonies and Great Britain had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Laws of 1767. This legislative body he considered that these rules were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.
However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that the legislature had no right to assign taxes to them. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did It was constitutional, but in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies, anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American idealists discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies - which had their own legislatures - should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.
They also signed the treaty of Versailles, in which gave them a starting advantage in WWII
