Answer:
Not a movie, but the Frankenstein musical did a pretty good job of recreating the novel. I watched the movie years ago, but I barely remember it. All I know is that they cut out Henry Clerval and made Victor old. In the novel, Victor is in his early twenties, and so many of the movie remakes make him a stereotypical "mad scientist". That's why I like the musical better than I do the movies. He's played by Hunter Foster, and even if Foster is in his 50's, he still looks and sounds young. His voice perfectly fits Victor, in a sort of "prestigious scientist who needs to take a nap" way. Very specific, but it makes sense. Then there's Henry, who doesn't get a huge part, but he's not that important in the novel either. He's actually there, though, and that's what makes the musical so good! Plus, they stayed true to the novel and made the creature learn English. In so many other adaptations, they make the creature this eight foot tall man who can't speak, while in the novel he has a great dialect and talks better than most people I know. In the musical, they stay true to this and cast someone who has a deep, baritone voice to play him. The casting choices are amazing, the way they stayed with the novel is great, and even as a standalone show the music is wonderful.
Explanation:
Answer:
Chamberlain’s Men, a theatrical company with which William Shakespeare was intimately connected for most of his professional career as a dramatist. It was the most important company of players in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.
Answer:
a phone line
Explanation:
Mr. Hale goes to John and Minnie Wrights' house because he wants to talk to John about sharing a party phone line. During the play's time setting and because of the isolated area, it was not uncommon for neighbors to have a party line.
Answer:
The London dialect is the basis of modem English
Explanation:
The written form of modern English is based on the London dialect, which greatly influenced written forms when modern English was established. However, the pronunciation of words within modern English has changed a lot over the years, moving further away from the London dialect, mainly by adding new words and words mixed with foreign languages.
This proves how the language is a living system in constant evolution and modification, following the advance of humanity.
After reading the passage, we can say that the grammatical mistake present in it is the following:
(P) Superlative form of the adjective.
<h3>When should we use the superlative?</h3>
- The superlative form of an adjective is used to indicate that someone or someone possesses a certain quality in an incomparable way. There is no competition - no other person or thing in that group that can beat that person or thing.
- For example, imagine a group of three people. John is taller than James, but James is taller than Eric. We can immediately tell that John is also taller than Eric. Thus, in that group of people, <u>John is the tallest.</u> There is no competition - no one in that group is taller than he is.
<h3>Why is the superlative wrong in the question?</h3>
- The problem here is that "largest" is a superlative, but we are only comparing two types of kayaks. The sentence is not affirming that a certain kayak is the largest of all in a group, only that it is larger than another one.
- In this case, the use of the comparative form "larger" sounds much better than the use of the superlative. When comparing two people or two objects, we should to go for the comparative form.
Learn more about the superlative of adjectives here:
brainly.com/question/14163964
