Answer:
<u>The effect of government regulation on a monopolist's production decisions</u>
Explanation:
The effect of a large government budget deficit on the economy's price level
The superavit or deficit of the government is a macroeconomics subject.
The money market is also macroeconomics.
The impact of regulation or specifit taxes or tax extemption on a monopolist's production will be part of microecnomics, because it will impact on which level the monopolist's production finds equilibrium after the legislation.
Answer:
- Users who viewed a website search result page
- Users who viewed product detail pages
- Users who abandoned their shopping carts
Explanation:
Remember, the ultimate aim of marketing is achieved only when the seller makes a sale to the user.
However, in all the above scenarios no sale was actually made, and so there's a need for dynamic remarketing in other achieve the sales objective.
Answer:
Trade
Explanation:
The consumption possibility can be gotten from three different factors, it could be gotten from opportunity for trade, production set and also from consumption behavior.
Involving in trade would reduce the prices of goods for consumers, especially in a country that is involved in importation. It creates gains for consumers. Therefore it can be said that trade is a key to better consumption possibilities.
Answer:
Accounts Receivable $8,820
To Sales Revenue $8,820
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the sales revenue is shown below:
Accounts receivable A/c Dr $8,820
To Sales revenue A/c $8,820
(Being merchandise sold on credit basis)
For recording this we debited the account receivable as it increased the assets and credited the sales revenue as it also increased the revenue
The computation of sales revenue is shown below:
= Sales revenue - discount
= $9,000 - $9,000 × 2%
= $9,000 - $180
= $8,820
This is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer: B) Owners can refuse to rent to prospects who have long hair and ride motorcycles.
Explanation:
The 1968 Federal Fair Housing Laws established that it is illegal to discriminate or refuse housing to a person based on <em>race or color; religion; national origin; familial status or age—includes families with children under the age of 18 and pregnant women; disability or handicap, or sex. </em>
Option A would be considered as a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation of the law.
Option C would be a violation of the no discrimination based on sex stipulation of the law.
And Option D would be a subtle violation but nonetheless a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation.
Option B is the only option that doesn't seem to break any of the stipulations of the 1968 act.
