Answer:
Yes if they have enough votes.
Explanation:
Checks and balances so that no one branch, executive, legislative, or judicial can takeover the power in the U.S.
- It had foreign spheres of influence.
- It failed to institute reforms.
- It avoided modernization.
I hope this helps :)
It's hard to define a decisive turning point in Greek history as there were many.
However, one that really might stand out apart from the rest was their wars with the Persians. They were successful in their defence against a Persian invasion, an invasion of an empire that was drastically bigger than the combined Greek lands.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.
John Marshall's approach was different from the role envisioned for the court by the writers of the Constitution in that Marshall believed the United States Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.
John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation, and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.
I think it was about $150 k