Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em>improved seafaring technologies</em>
Answer:
d
Explanation:
he then began to campaign against local chieftains and warlords that were stretched as far as Punjab in Indus Valley. By the time of his death, he was emperor over most regions of Greece and the conquered Persian Empire (including much of Egypt).
a) They sent a runner to Athens to tell them of the victory and he said, "Victory is ours!" and then died of exhaustion is your answer.
The Battle of Marathon was well known, because while Athens was able to beat the much stronger Persian army, it was also where the term "marathon", and the event that "marathon" is used to describe was born.
The runner that they sent ran non-stop (typical of a marathon) from the battle field to Athens to deliver the news of victory. However, after getting there & delivering the news, he died, possibly from exhaustion.
~
Answer:
The main reason the Virginia settlement were able to prosper financially is because they settled for economic opportunities. In the colony's first settlement, Jamestown, they first made money by farming tobacco. The demand for tobacco became higher and higher as it spread around and it soon became Virginia's main export.
Please paraphrase just in case.
Hope this helps!
