Answer is <em>Cash </em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em> </em><em> </em><em>hope </em><em>it</em><em> helps</em>
<em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>pls </em><em>mark</em><em> brainliest</em>
Does not want to be alone as he did earlier in the poem
1. D) 1744
2. A) The new Massachusetts state constitution changed the lives of enslaved people living there.
3. C) Because Elizabeth’s life story was recorded by historians or people who knew her secondhand, so the author has to guess what she might have been thinking.
4. B) Elizabeth Freeman was born into slavery and fought for her freedom in court when a new Massachusetts state constituion was passed, and lived the rest of her life as a free Black woman who was paid for her labor.
Umm i don’t think a scary story has happened to me
I think that the <em>interference of gods in human life</em> would be good if they use their experience <u>to improve our existence</u>, to stop certain things from happening, to help mortals.
This is <u>what Athena tries to do for Oddyseus and his family</u>. She disguises as a friend of Laertes, Odysseus' father. She then meets Telemachus and she advises him to meet with his mother's suitors.
Athena also connects him to kings Nestor and Menelaus so the prince can know his father, Odysseus, is actually alive.
Further evidence of positive interference is <u>Zeus sending Hermes to convince Calypso to set Odysseus free.</u>
<u>On the contrary</u>, when <u>Poseidon</u>, god of the sea, finds Odysseus escaping on a ship he causes a storm to sink it. He decides to do this because of revenge since Oddyseus had blinded his son on a previous adventure.
<em>To summarize</em>, I believe gods interference should be allowed only when it can be helpful when it can raise the quality of life.
