Answer:
m < EAD = 29 degrees
m < CAB = 119 degrees
Given :
The question states that m < CAE = m<FAB = 61 degrees and m<DAF = 90 degrees
Solution:
1. Since line CAF and EAB intersect each other, m<CAF = m< EAF - (opposite vertical angles are equivalent)
2. m<BAC + m<EAC = 180 degrees (sum of linear pair)
3. m<CAB = 180 degrees - m<EAC
4. Equation 1: m<CAB = m<EAF = 119 degrees
5. m<EAF = m<EAD + m< DAF
6. m<EAD = m<EAF - m<DAF
7. m<EAD = 119 degrees-90 degrees = 29 degrees
Hope this helps!!! :)
Attached photo work is created by another brainly user named tallinn.
Click on this link to find his work and possibly more information of the answer. Thanks!
Answer:
c≥2(x-2) ÷ 5
Step-by-step explanation:
5c+3≥6x-8
5c ≥6x-8-3
5c≥6x-12
c≥(6x-12) ÷ 5
c≥ 2(x-2) ÷5
Answer:
27.5 miles per gallon
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
D. g(x) = (x+ 4)² + 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, the given function is f(x) = x²
Now,if a graph x² is translated by (h,k) where:
h = Translation done towards RIGHT
k = Translation done towards UP
Then the translated equation is given as:
y = (x-h)² + k .... (1)
Now here, the graph is translated 6 UNITS UP and 4 UNITS LEFT.
⇒ h = - 4 and k = 6
Substituting the value of h, k in (1) , we get:
g(x) = (x-(-4))² + 6 = (x+ 4)² + 6
⇒ g(x) = (x+ 4)² + 6
Hence, the equation of the translated function, g(x) is g(x) = (x+ 4)² + 6.
<h3>
Answer: B) II and III</h3>
====================================================
Explanation:
Check out the diagram below.
On the left side shows ASA can be used to prove the triangles congruent. Note the color coding to see how the angles match up. Also note that the segment TR is between angles STR and SRT. The order is important because ASA is different from AAS.
Angle STR = Angle VTU because they are vertical angles
Angle SRT = Angle VUT since they are alternate interior angles. Note how SR is parallel to UV. If the lines weren't parallel, then the alternate interior angles would not be congruent.
We can use AAS because if we know two angles of a triangle, we can find the third angle. Despite the fact that something like RST looks like a right angle, we don't have enough info to say it is or not. The square angle marker is missing. So it could be 90 degrees, or it might be something like 89 degrees instead. We don't have enough info. So we cannot use HL.
AAA or AA is not a congruence theorem. It's a similarity theorem. So we cross this off the list.
