Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
one positive is: there is no longer slavery!
and one negitive: that slavery ever happened!
Explanation:
one positive, is everyone learned as to why it wasnt okay and learned from there mistakes, so that is good.
and one negitve is the indent of how many people were hurt and how many families were broken because of it.
hope this helps
Answer:
a) Hotel Rooms are inelastic because hotel rooms are fixed in supply and it take large amount of time to expand the number of rooms. (b) Taxi rides are elastic because the ride increase or decrease their duty time according to...
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Escrow clause
Explanation:
C. Escrow clause
An escrow agreement is a legal document outlining terms and conditions between parties as well as the responsibility of each.
Agreements usually involve an independent third party called an escrow agent, who holds an asset until the contract's conditions are met
Escrow agreements are commonly used in real estate transactions.
The escrow agreement generally includes, but is not limited to, information about the escrow agent's identity, the funds in escrow, and the acceptable use of funds by the agent.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The best is to raise reserve requirement.
The capacity of the current reserve is based on its requirements. in other to expand, or improve the capacity, is to raise the requirement of the reserve.
It is just like having a pocket that can receive 100, if you want to increase the capacity of the pocket, you will need to adjust the pocket size, this is raising the pocket requirement for you to receive 200 in same pocket.
From my analogy, option B is the best answer to the question.
