2 years ago

Why were Roman consuls awarded the power of the veto?

2 answers:

6 0

The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank.

Setler79 [48]2 years ago

4 0

There were always two consuls in power at a given point of time. The right to veto the other's decision was seen as a measure to prevent the abuse of power by the other consul.

You might be interested in

What are three of the primary considerations that needed to be addressed when the Civil War ended? What would the requirements b

eduard

The three primary reasons are <em>the requirements for Confederate states to reenter the Union; overseeing the rebuilding of a Southern economic infrastructure; the fate of millions of freed slaves.</em> These were the main issues and hot topics of American Civil War during that time.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If your five-year-old self suddenly found themselves inhabiting your current body, what would your five-year-old self do first?

iris [78.8K]

I would go tell my parents and get alot of ice cream and starbucks

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Customarily, tenant improvements become the property of the landlord in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary. Wha

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

Trade fixtures

Explanation:

Trade fixtures are pieces of equipment or furniture that a tenant attaches to a property during the rental period, and that can be removed once the rent agreement expires. These trade fixtures are property of the tenant, not of the landlord.

Some examples of trade fixtures are: