The answer is: Estelle V. Gamble
Before the case, prison inmates were treated inhumanely. They often given rotten foods for their meals which cause physical harm to many of them and the government had no responsibility to took care of them when they're sick because they believed it was a 'waste of resource'
By seeing tv or learning by others
Answer: A sin tax is placed on cigarettes purchases in stores
Explanation:
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
