Answer:
The correct answer to this question will be: <u><em>destruction of ancient forests for new farmland in the Northeast</em></u>
Explanation: I just took the test and that was the correct answer...
Hope this helps you with what ever it is you are working on...
Answer:
The Brest-Litovsk
Explanation:
He signed a peace treaty on March 3rd, 1918 that withdrew Russia from World War I.
The quantity demanded fall because the price increased. Here the goods follow the Law of Demand.
According to the Law of Demand, whenever there is an increase in price of a commodity then the demand for that commodity decreases. This is also true vice-versa. The price and demand for the commodity shares an inverse relation.
There are many things which determine a demand like income of a consumer, preferences to buy a product and making a decision to buy a substitute for a product.
The questions regarding the supply of a product matching its demand in the market and setting the market prices are all answered by the law of demand and supply.
To know more about Law of Demand here
brainly.com/question/10782448
#SPJ4
The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>
Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.
In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative
Read more about legal experts
brainly.com/question/1346208
#SPJ1
CQ
What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?
A. It discredits the impact of the Gault case on the juvenile justice system.
B. It reveals the positive changes to the system that the public ignores.
C. It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for their actions.
D. It offers insight into the state of the juvenile justice system.
