The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
I am batman and I speak batman and I speak batman and I speak batman and I speak batman and I speak batman.
Variable is a letter next to a number whether it’s x or y it can be any letter really but main ones is x and y and data is something written down from an oberservartion whether it’s an experiment or table etc.
Answer:
True
You don't need sugar for energy. Carbo hydrates and protiens gets converted into glucose for energy. Whereas if you eat sugar it will mess with your glucose level in blood. It is linked with diseases and health hazards such as type 2 diabetes, heart diseases,obesity,cognitive dysfunction in children, aging faster,etc.
Morever as you age your body can't handle too much spike in blood sugar leading to t2d(insulin resistivity /low production of insulin).
Also as sugar crosses brain barrier easily, it will cause several brain diseases eventually.
