The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question
Suppose the demand for Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) is given by Q = 250 - .25p + 4pc, where Q is the quantity of DVRs demanded (in 1000s), p is the price of a DVR, and pc is the price of cable television. How much does the quantity demanded for DVRs change if the p rises by $40? A) drops by 10,000 DVRs B) increases by 16,000 DVRs C) drops by 2,500 DVRs D) increases by 4,000
Answer:
Drops by 10,000 DVRs
Explanation:
The demand for digital video recorders is expressed by
Q= 250- .25p+4pc
Where
Q represents the quantity demanded by the customers
P represents the price of DVR
pc represents the price of cable television
Since the factor of p in the expression above is negative, this implies that the quantity of DVR demanded in the market will reduce
If the price of DVR increase by $40, then the quantity demanded will reduce by
= 0.25×40×1000
= 10×1000
= 10,000 units
Hence the quantity of DVRs drops by 10,000 DVRs if the price is increased to $40
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Answer :
a) Economic Production Quantity = 1,612 monitors
b) Number of setups = 1.4
c) Total cost = $972.12 per year
Explanation :
As per the data given in the question,
a) Economic Production Quantity = sqrt((2 × annual demand × set up cost) ÷ carrying cost × (1 - daily demand ÷ daily production))
=sqrt((2 × 2,250 × $350) ÷ $0.80 × (1 - 35 ÷ 140))
= 1,620.19
= 1,621 monitors
b) Number of setups = Annual demand ÷ Economic production quantity
= 2,250 ÷ 1,621
= 1.3880
= 1.4
c) Formula of Total cost = Carrying cost + Annual setup cost
Carrying cost=(Economic production quantity ÷ 2) × Carrying cost × (1 - daily demand ÷ daily production)
= (1,612 ÷ 2)× $0.80 × (1 -35 ÷ 140)
= $486.30
Annual setup cost = (Annual demand ÷ Economic production quantity) × setup cost
= (2,250 ÷ 1,621) × $350
= $485.812
So, Total cost = $486.30 + $485.812
= $972.12 each year
We simply applied the above formulas
The Coca-Cola Company sells its products to bottling and canning operations, distributers, fountain wholesalers and some fountain retailers. They then distribute them to retail outlets, corner stores, restaurants, petrol stations and many more.
When I had this question I found the link witch is on the document very helpful.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
In supply chain management, incremental analysis is in charge of determining the cost of ordering one more additional unit of a product over the cost of no requesting that additional unit. The cost of overstimulating demand is the loss of ordering one additional unit and discovering that it cannot be sold. The cost of underestimating demand is the opportunity loss for nor requesting one additional and discovering it could have been sold.
<em>The cost of underestimating demand is more difficult to determine than the cost of overestimating demand because underestimating demand because it involves customer's desires</em> on purchasing a product when not having the resources to do so.
