Since, options are not given, the question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows:
Which supreme court procedure involves justices discussing a case, debating its key issues, and arriving at their own opinions on the appropriate ruling?
a. deliberation
b. judicial review
c. sharing opinions
d. public arguments
Answer: b. judicial review
Explanation:
Judicial review can be defined as the power of the court to examine the case in the court of law and actions of the executive, administration and legislature of the country. The judicial review can be given a judge of court or jury. The judge of the Supreme Court is expected to give fair opinion. The jury of supreme court can discuss about a case.
Answer:
Philip himself is who is responsible
Explanation:
hope this helped
Starting the stories with his childhood makes Ngugi's stories seem more real than others because people think that it is a real life story.Mentioning childhood invokes multiple senses of the readers,engages the readers,evokes strong emotions as people start to think of their own childhood as well, helps in creating intriguing and complex characters for Ngugi's stories,the writer may use rich character voice,Ngugi is able to pull his readers into action.
Answer:
Personal fable
Explanation:
Mark just got his driver's license. He loves to speed around town going more than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit. He believes that he can speed through red lights due to his perfect timing. This is an example of <u>personal fable</u>. Personal fable is a cognitive limitation linked to egocentrism in adolescents, where they believe that their life is special and meant to be heroic and as such none of life's difficulties or problems will affect them regardless of their behavior. This causes them to take unnecessary risk and live risky lifestyles.
Answer:
<h3>Legally insane.</h3>
Explanation:
A court may declare a defendant legally insane if he/she pass a series of insanity tests. It includes the "M'Naghten Rule" test, the "Irresistible Impulse" Test,The "Durham Rule" and The "Model Penal Code" Test for Legal Insanity.
A court may allow an insanity defense if the defendant can prove to the court that he/she did not understand what they did, failed to understand right from wrong, was unable to control impulse due to mental disease or some other factors which resulted from mental instability.
