Your answer would be D) Mesopotamians believed in the "eye for an eye" approach to justice. The phrase "eye for an eye" means someone that does something to another person should be penalized in a similar matter. And most of the laws have people's consequences relating to the actions that they made.
The answer is NOT (A) because there were classes during their time period.
The answer is NOT (B) because there were rules, and the rules were from The Code of Hammurabi.
The answer is NOT (C) because in Law #205, it says, " If the slave of a freed man strike the body of a freed man, his ear shall be cut off." But, if it were the opposite way, the free man strikes the slave, the free man wouldn't be as punished like the slave.
For everyone to have the same rights (hope that helps )
True.
Machiavelli read much in Marcus Tullius Cicero's writings and was influenced by Cicero, but Machiavelli's claim to fame stems from his own writing. His brief work entitled, <em>The Prince, </em>is looked upon as perhaps the first text of political science (as opposed to political philosophy). <em>The Prince </em>described the workings of politics as Machiavelli observed how things happened in Renaissance Italy. Machiavelli also wrote in the political philosophy vein with his longer work called <em>Discourses on Livy, </em>which examined the values of a republic-style government.