Answer:
b) False
Explanation:
This statement is false one because while making a decision there are numerous factors involved, for example:
Initiator: The person who after processing some information about a product, watching an ad etc, initiates the task of buying it.
Influencer: Person who influence the initiator further processing.
Decider: Person who decides that the particular products should be bought.
Purchaser: Person who actually go to the market and purchase that product.
User: Person who actually use that product.
In above all of the described roles, it could be one single person who perform all the tasks, or it could be 2 to 5 different persons involved and each one performing the separate role. So, there are 5 roles involved in an actual buying process, here family role comes that it is obvious that much roles are involved, any single role can be performed by any of his or her family member, therefore, family influence is there in a purchase decision, somehow or other.
Answer: 1. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: South Africa raised its tariffs on goods imported from India.; 2. North American Free Trade Agreement: Canada wants to begin selling animal pelts in Mexico.; 3. China discovered that Japan had sold diseased meats in the country.
Explanation: I had this question on an assignment and got them correct
<u>Answer:
</u>
It can be said that the student version exemplifies paraphrasing plagiarism.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The contexts of the texts given above under the titles original source material and student version are clearly the same.
- It can be observed that most words used in both texts are the same but the arrangement of the words is different.
- To retain the meaning of the text but still make the text look different, the formation of the sentences has been made differently using the same words.
- Hence, it can be called an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.
Answer:
Theres a choice between judge and jury, a citizen gets the choice.
