Answer:
<em>I</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>think</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>true</em><em>.</em>
I believe the answer is: Not been disseminated before unless noted otherwise.
This ethical perception exist to held the writers accountable for the validity of things that they wrote. Since it is an ethical standard, technically the writers would not face legal punishment as long as they made a dissemination when the things they wrote are proven to be wrong.
Answer: b. Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act is the only one of these acts that did not impact Asian Americans. The act was enacted in November 1990, and it requires institutions that receive federal funding to return Native American items to the descendants of the tribes. This includes human remains, funerary objects and other cultural items. It also establishes procedures for the inadvertent discovery of those items.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
d!
Thought I'd add it on here too. :)