1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady bird [3.3K]
3 years ago
14

In circle O, if LP congruent LK, find the measurement of the major arc PNK. A. 112 B.156 C.224 D.248

Mathematics
2 answers:
Maru [420]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1,5/5=279,3

Step-by-step explanation:

klasskru [66]3 years ago
3 0
Sorry here for points
You might be interested in
Michael earns $8 an hour to baby sit the Jackson family. How many hours does he have to 1 point
notsponge [240]

Answer:

7 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

56/8=7

7 0
3 years ago
Julia has 2 identical rooms in her house. If each room measures 8 fee on one side and 12 feet on another, what is the total area
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:

all you have to is 8x12 multiplied by 2 since there is 2 rooms which is 192


5 0
3 years ago
Two tailors, Valentina and Laura, sit down to do some embroidery. Valentina can embroider 2 shirts per hour, and Laura can get t
mina [271]

Answer:

Valentina and Laura finished the same total number of shirts in 4 hours.

Total number of shirts finished by Valentina =23

Total number of shirts finished by Laura =23

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose that Valentina and Laura finished the same total number of shirts in t hours.

Valentina can embroider 2 shirts per hour and Valentina has already completed 15 shirts.

Total number of shirts finished by Valentina =2t+15

Laura can get through 3 shirts per hour and Laura has completed 11 shirts.

Total number of shirts finished by Laura =3t+11

Therefore,

2t+15=3t+11\\3t-2t=15-11\\t=4

So,

Valentina and Laura finished the same total number of shirts in 4 hours.

Total number of shirts finished by Valentina =2(4)+15=8+15=23

Total number of shirts finished by Laura =3(4)+11=12+11=23

6 0
2 years ago
Find the area of the regular polygon​
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

A = 374.123 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

First, lets calculate the perimeter:

Perimeter (p) = side length (s) * number of sides (n)

p = s * n

p = 12 * 6

p = 72

Next, lets find the apothem, which is the shortest length from any side to the middle. It's like the radius in a circle, but more complicated.

Apothem (a) = side length (s) / ( 2 * tan(180/number of sides (n)) )

a = \frac{s}{2 * tan (\frac{180}{n} )}

a = \frac{12}{2 * tan (\frac{180}{6} )}

a = \frac{12}{2 * \frac{\sqrt{3} }{3}}

a = \frac{12}{\frac{2\sqrt{3} }{3}}

a = \frac{12*3}{2\sqrt{3}}

a = \frac{6*3}{\sqrt{3}}

a = \frac{18}{\sqrt{3}}

Now, finally, to find the area of a regular polygon, we use the following equation:

Area (A) = ( apothem (a) * perimeter (p) ) / 2

A = \frac{a * p}{2}

A = \frac{\frac{18}{\sqrt{3} }  * 72}{2}

A = \frac{18}{\sqrt{3}}  * 36

A = \frac{640}{\sqrt{3}}

Turning into a decimal:

A = 374.123 ft ^2

8 0
2 years ago
Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness
Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their  financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is  H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

b

in 2012  \r  p_1  =0.41

in 2010  \r  p_2  =0.35  

c

The  p-value  is  p-value = 0.0072

The conclusion is

There is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that  financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of  those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size in 2012 is  n_1  =  1000

    The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  k  =  410  

     The  sample  size in 2010  is  n_2  =  900

   The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  u  =  315

     The  level of significance is  \alpha  =  0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

Generally the sample proportion for  2012 is mathematically represented as

     \r  p_1  =  \frac{k}{n_1}

=>   \r  p_1  =  \frac{410}{1000}

=>   \r  p_1  =0.41

Generally the sample proportion for  2010 is mathematically represented as

      \r  p_2  =  \frac{u}{n_2}

=>   \r  p_2  =  \frac{315}{900}

=>   \r  p_2  =0.35    

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

      \r p =  \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}

=>     \r p =  \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}

=>      \r p =  0.3816

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     z =  \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )}  }

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }    

 

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }

   z  =  2.688

Generally the p- value  is mathematically represented as  

      p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688  )

From the z -table  

      P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036

So  

      p-value = 2 *0.0036

        p-value = 0.0072

So from the p-value  obtained we see that p-value  <  \alpha so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please Help!!
    15·2 answers
  • ana divides the number N by 8nand gets .25 as her answer . Barney multiplies the same.number N by 8 . what should he get ?
    12·1 answer
  • How you multiply 523x12
    6·2 answers
  • Serious inquiries only please and double check ur work please before posting
    13·1 answer
  • What is 4x + 2(3y - 2x)
    13·1 answer
  • The question is about square root
    7·2 answers
  • Help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    8·1 answer
  • The proof that HG ≅ EG is shown.
    7·2 answers
  • I need help with this problem down below
    10·1 answer
  • C. Are 2b + b and 3b equivalent expressions​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!