1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sindrei [870]
3 years ago
8

2000x100 guesss yall

Mathematics
2 answers:
andreev551 [17]3 years ago
6 0
200,000 there you go
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

200,000

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Consider the following argument. If there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers, then the set of all irra
FrozenT [24]

Answer:

b. form: p → q invalid, converse error q ∴ p

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

p = "there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers,"

let

q = "the set of all irrational numbers is infinite."

We can write the above argument as:

If there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers, then the set of all irrational numbers is infinite

p → q

The set of all irrational numbers is infinite

q

There are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers

p

So collectively it can be written as:

p → q

 q

∴p

So it looks like

if p then q

q

therefore p

This is a fallacious argument.  This means the conclusion can be false even when the premises are true. This type of argument is invalid.

Suppose we know that “If there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers, then the set of all irrational numbers is infinite” is a true conditional statement. We also know that "the set of all irrational numbers is infinite" is true. This is not enough to say that "there are as many rational numbers as there are irrational numbers," is true. The reason for this is that there is nothing logically about “If p then q” and “q” that means p must follow. So this is a converse error and since converse error is an invalid method of inference rule so this argument is invalid.

Let us prove this argument is invalid with a truth table:

p   q   p → q   q   p

T   T      T       T   T

T   F      F       F   T

F   T      T       T   F

F   F      T       F   F

Since we know that the premises are:

p → q   and  q

and the conclusion is p

and an argument is valid if and only if all of its premises are true, then the conclusion is true. We should check that whenever both p → q   and  q are true then p is true but the third row fails. Thus this is an invalid argument.

6 0
3 years ago
How much kinetic energy does a 80 kg man have while running at 1.5 M/S
Anni [7]
KE=1/2(m)(v)^2 


KE=1/2(80)(1.5)^2


KE=90 J
7 0
3 years ago
The transitive property holds true for similar figures.<br><br> Always<br> Sometimes<br> Never
liubo4ka [24]

Answer: Always.


Step-by-step explanation:

The transitive property holds true for similar figures always because similar figures have similar shapes, the same angles and dimensions are proportional.

For example:- If figure 1 is similar to figure 2 then both have same shape and same angles and dimensions are proportional .

If figure 2 is similar to figure 3 then both have same shape and same angles and dimensions are proportional .

⇒ figure 1 is similar to figure 3 the both have same shape and same angles and dimensions are proportional as the figure 2 .

Thus the transitive property holds true for similar figures always.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Energy for both renewable and nonrenewable sources originally comes from
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

The sun is the primary source because without it there will be nothing like renewable or nonrenewable energy

7 0
2 years ago
8 to the power 1/6 times 2 to the power x equals 32 to the power 1/2
Elza [17]

The exact value of x is 2.

<h3>What is linear equation?</h3>

A linear equation is a first-order (linear) term plus a constant in the algebraic form y=mx+b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. This is sometimes referred to as a "linear equation with two variables," where y and x are the variables.

8⁽¹/⁶⁾ x 2ˣ = 32⁽¹/²⁾

32⁽¹/²⁾ = 2⁵⁽¹/²⁾

32⁽¹/²⁾ = 2⁽⁵/²⁾

8⁽¹/⁶⁾ = 2³⁽¹/⁶⁾

8⁽¹/⁶⁾ = 2⁽¹/²⁾

8⁽¹/⁶⁾ x 2ˣ = 2⁽¹/²⁾ x 2ˣ

= 2⁽¹/²⁾+ˣ  

= 2⁽¹/²+ˣ⁾

since 8⁽¹/⁶⁾ x 2ˣ  = 32⁽¹/²⁾

= 2⁽⁵/²⁾

2⁽¹/²+ˣ⁾ = 2⁽⁵/²⁾

equate the powers

1/2+ x = 5/2

subtract 1/2 from both sides

x = 5/2 - 1/2

x = (5-1)/2

x = 4/2

x= 2

Therefore, x = 2 is the exact value of x.

To know more about linear equation, visit:

brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ9

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The stem-and-leaf plot represents the distances, in miles, people in an office drive to work each morning.
    15·1 answer
  • If t(n) equals 3+2n, what is the 5th term?<br> If X+y=6 find the value of y when X=-2
    13·1 answer
  • Find the slope between (1,5)(3,9)
    6·1 answer
  • A hardware store sold 430 lawn mowers in one year. If 221 lawn mowers were purchased in the spring, what is the ratio of the num
    5·2 answers
  • Help... do I add or divide?
    11·2 answers
  • A stretch of highway has a 4% uphill grade. This means that the road rises 1 foot for every 25 feet of horizontal distance. The
    5·1 answer
  • Write in standard form.<br> 4y - 3 = 6x + 6
    5·2 answers
  • (07.01)<br> What is the value of y in the equation y-7 = 21? (4 points)
    12·2 answers
  • Nicole took out a 30-year mortgage for $90,000 at 7.5%. How much is her monthly mortgage payment? I assume $675,000?
    15·1 answer
  • Please help with this geometry work asp
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!