Dowkkwvjwun2fsgzvzejqk82293o3o3oi

Four ways in which the kruger national park combats rhino poaching

alina1380 [7]

As I remember it correctly four strategies in which the kruger national park combats rhino poaching sound like that:
*Restricted trade in rhino horn;
*Unrestricted trade in rhino horn;
*Status Quo;
*Demand reduction.

5 0

3 years ago

This year, Paula and Simon (married filing jointly) estimate that their tax liability will be $218,000. Last year, their total t

romanna [79]

Answer:

1. Yes

2. $7,400

Explanation:

Basic Rules For Estimated Tax For Individuals

Any individual who has estimated tax for the year of $1,000 or more and whose withholding does not equal or exceed the “required annual payment” must make quarterly payments. Otherwise, a penalty may be assessed. The required annual payment is the smaller of the following amounts:

1.Ninety percent of the tax shown on the current year's return.

2.One hundred percent of the tax shown on the preceding year's return (the return must cover the full 12 months of the preceding year). If the AGI on the preceding year's return exceeds $150,000 ($75,000 if married filing separately), the 100% requirement is increased to 110%.

Are Paula and Simon required to increase their withholdings or make estimated tax payments this year to avoid the underpayment penalty?

Following the basic rules above, yes, Paula and Simon have to increase their withholdings or make estimated tax payments this year to avoid the underpayment penalty.

If so, how much?

Amount of income tax liability = $218,000

In general, taxpayers must pay at least 90 percent of their tax bill during the year to avoid an underpayment penalty when they file.

Therefore Minimum estimated payments-90% : $218,000 * 0.9 = $196,200

110% of the preceding year's tax: $182,000 * 1.10 = $200,200

According to the basic rules the required annual payment is the smaller which is $196,200.

Tax withholding from their employers = $188,800

Estimated tax payments required = $196,200 - $188,800 = $7,400

5 0

2 years ago

Holiday Laboratories purchased a high-speed industrial centrifuge at a cost of $440,000. Shipping costs totaled $30,000. Foundat

Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

d. $489,500

Explanation:

The capitalized cost will include all the costs incurred by Holiday laboratories to readily make the asset for use.

Therefore,

Capitalized cost = High speed industrial centrifuge + Shipping cost + Foundation cost + Equipment cost + Labor and testing cost + Material cost

= $440,000 + $30,000 + $8,600 + $3,000 + $5,300 + $2,600

= $489,500

7 0

3 years ago

Gentry Inc. purchased 90% of Gaspard Farms on January 5, 2019. During 2019, Gentry sold Gaspard Farms for $650,000 goods which h

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

$5572500

Explanation:

consolidated cost of goods sold for 2020 would be:

consolidated cost of goods sold = ( total of goods sold by bought company ) - ( intra-entity transfer ) + ( ending unrealized gross profit ) - ( beginning unrealized gross profit )

= ( 5400000 + 1200000 ) - ( 1000000 )+(1000000*20%)*20% - {(650000*15%)*(450000/650000)}

= 6600000 - 1040000 - ( 97500 * 45/65 )

= $5572500

3 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast the three options from the perspective of cost. Which one do you believe will provide the most economical s

Anvisha [2.4K]

Incomplete question. The full question read:

Power Force Corporation Kip Himmer, executive vice president of operations of Power Force Corporation (PFC), is feeling stressed out. The producer of power tools for the do-it-yourself market is experiencing higher fulfillment costs as retailers change their buying patterns. They all seem to want smaller, more frequent shipments to a larger number of locations. And, the retailers' service expectations are on the rise. They are demanding advanced shipping notification, RFID tags on all products, and improved inventory visibility. Gone are the days when the retailers bought power tools by the truckload for delivery to a few regionally dispersed distribution centers. Instead, they are asking for smaller shipments to multiple distribution centers and direct delivery to stores. Some retailers are also inquiring about PFC's ability to deliver orders for individual customers direct to their homes. This drop-shipping strategy is completely new to PFC and Himmer worries that it could create major bottlenecks at the company's centralized delivery center that sits next to the factory in Louiseville Kentucky. And, all of these new requirements are accompanied by shorter order cycle time goals. Himmer feels that he is stuck between a rock and a hard place as the major home improvement chain stores (Home Depot, Lowe's, and True Value) account for more than 80 percent of PFC's sales. Although compliance is proving to be very expensive, PFC cannot afford to deny the requests. Doing so would have an unwelcome effect on revenues. After consulting with his fulfillment team, Himmer has come to the conclusion that he has three reasonable options to address the emerging marketplace requirements.

Option 1 - Upgrade the existing PFC distribution center in Kentucky to handle multiple order types and smaller shipments. Deploy warehouse automation to improve order fulfillment speed and efficiency.

Options 2 - Expand the PFC fulfillment network. Add regional distribution centers in Nevada and New Jersey to the existing Kentucky distribution center. Modify operational processes and flows so that orders for delivery centers, stores, and individual consumers can be fulfilled.

Options 3 - Outsource fulfillment to a capable third party logistics company so that PFC can focus its efforts on quality production, accurate demand planning, and lean inventory management.

Himmer's next step is to fully evaluate the three options and choose a path forward before his upcoming meeting with Marcia Avis, the owner of PFC. Avis will ask tough questions and Himmer must be confident in his recommendations.

Compare and contrast the three options from the perspective of customer service. Which one do you believe will provide the most economical solution for PFC?

Answer:

Options 3 - Outsource fulfillment to a capable third party logistics company so that PFC can focus its efforts on quality production, accurate demand planning, and lean inventory management.

Explanation:

In terms of cost, it will be preferable if Himmer outsourced the fulfillment objectives to another company that is capable because if for example, they decide to go with:

option 1: they will need to set aside large funds investing in physical infrastructure; such as upgrading the existing PFC distribution center in Kentucky, buying warehouse automation tools, etc. Or they chose;

option 2: It also requires even more funds to be able to expand and add new regional distribution centers in Nevada and New Jersey, etc.

7 0

2 years ago

Dowkkwvjwun2fsgzvzejqk82293o3o3oi​

Dowkkwvjwun2fsgzvzejqk82293o3o3oi