The assumption the narrator makes in this excerpt would be that the audience they are directing this conversation to through the speaker (not sure if the speaker is a character or narrator so this is just a guess?) is uneducated or believes everything is one way. The character who is speaking references several philosophers and their various arguments, opinions, research and how he/she feels about those writings/topics. In the end of the paragraph, the speaker says "I could interface you guys right under the table" meaning that he/she could converge with them even if he was drunk (interface in the verb form meaning to interact or connect with another person; under the table meaning to be drunk). The last sentence he/she says "I'm not a creatus..." creatus being Latin for born of, or created, or sprung from. This suggests that they are not a God, or one who can create things, and also that they are NOT manufactured, or created in some factory. This means that they are simply smart and they are as they are literally. The narrator assumes his/her audience (to whom he/she is speaking) is not smart enough to understand that he/she is in fact a genius of birth, yet not a God. Smart simply by the means of being intelligent.
It helped by evolving into currencies and the present day marketing.
Provide picture? of the question to be able to understand
Answer:
The Roman Catholic Church is more focused on law, logic and the central authority of the Pope, while the Eastern Orthodox Church is more concerned with maintaining the mystery of faith and governing through consensus
The Roman Catholic Church became a political power in Western Europe and was influenced and influenced Western culture. The Greek Orthodox Church was ruled politically by the Eastern Roman Empire and was not so influences by politics. The Greek Orthodox Church was influenced by Eastern cultures.
did this answer your question?
Explanation:
