Answer:
A. separation of power
Explanation:
I have the same question on my test and I put separation of power because the article is about the branches (correct me if im wrong please)
1:
The "Anti Mask meeting" part because its dipicting its during the time of Late 2019-2021 were we have a mask ordinace thats according this "Unhealthy"
2:
"Anti mask meeting" by it self because it also is telling you that its meant for people who already wear masks and disagree on it.
3: "to protest against" and "Anti mask meeting" dipict that the purpose is to talk and protest against the mask mandate we have in multiple areas.
4:
The point of view of the creator is that the gathering is to protest against the wrongdoings of the mask madate examplifying the creator agrees with the people meeting and seems to intend to join them. Considering he calls the speakers "interesting" which is an opinon he gladly shared which only people do when they truely feel this way, and based on the way it was said it was a good verison of interesting. There for repersenting that he agrees and likes the idea of the meeting.
One text that is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as "evidence" is a historical novel.
Please mark Brainliset!
<span>I believe the answer is:
a person who worked for four to seven years for passage.</span>
Because socialism appeals to the base instincts of anyone. Socialism = laziness, and most people at the end of the day are lazy.
<span>If someone offers you money for free, are you likely to turn it down, even if it means the breakdown of your society? Probably not. </span>
<span>Look at today. People want to socialize health care even though it will kill jobs, blow up the deficit, and cause rationing and death panels. </span>
<span>People are lazy. That's why socialism gets footholds.</span>
