Answer:
1. adopt their husbands' surnames
Explanation:
Married women legally adopt their husband's surname, similar to the Spanish naming customs practised over centuries and until the present.
The surname rules can have some exceptions but, generally speaking, the Hispanics in Latin America will have two given names, including a paternal (primer apellido or apellido paterno) , and the maternal (segundo apellido or apellido materno) surnames.
When women are single, they use both surnames, and once they get married they will take the surname of the husband. This is an accepted and common practice that still exists today.
In some instances, she will be asked to provide her original maternal surname.
Land bridge theory many scholars think that 15,000 years ago during an ice age hunters crusty land bridge between Siberia and Alaska in search of mammoths and other animals coastal route theory today some scholars think that 40,000 years ago Hunters and gathers think others arrive on Smallboat eventually working on their way down the West Coast of America
Answer: The correct answer is A: one-branch government.
Explanation: i just took the quiz.
hope this helps you :)
Answer:
George Mason's primary objection to the Constitution was the absence of a bill of rights. He not only refused to sign the document at the convention, he hotly fought against it during Virginia ratification, despite promises by James Madison and others to add a bill of rights in the first congress.
<span><span>The Espionage Act of 1917
was created to forbid intrusion of military operations and military
recruitment. It was also intended to
stop insubordination in the military, and to check the assistance of enemies of
the United States during times of war. In 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court </span>solidly
declared through Schenck vs. United States that
the act did not disregard the freedom
of speech of those sentenced under its provisions. The case of Charles Schenck who was the
general secretary of the Executive Committee of the Socialist Party who
distributed leaflets exhorting men not to obey the draft because
they considered involuntary servitude.
Schenck and a fellow named were convicted because the court defended the
decision because the situation during times of war require stricter measures
compared to times of peace of the presence of dangerous forces.</span>
