Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Congruent triangles have the exact same three sides and the exact same angles. They are identical. So if you look at your triangles carefully, they are congruent. :)
Answer:
₱277.25
Step-by-step explanation:
₱500.00 - ₱98.75 - ₱73.75 - ₱50.25 = ₱277.25
Answer: since the parent function is f(x), then i think....
f(x) + 5 is the shifted 5 units up of f(x)
then the first answer is correct
f(x - 8) is 8 shifted 8 units right of f(x)
then the second answer is wrong,
f(x) is replaced by 4f(x) means it stretched vertically by a factor of 4
the the third answer is correct
f(x) is replaced with f(3x) compressed horizontally by a scale factor of 1/3
then the fourth answer is correct
Step-by-step explanation: i hope this makes since and sorry if it doesn't so the first is correct, second is wrong, third is correct, and fourth is also correct. and no there well be no links. (sorry if you do want links)
and maybe a brainliest