Answer/Explanation
The Treaty of Versailles could have been improved in many ways. First, more countries could have helped pay for the damage, The treaty gave some German territories to neighboring countries and placed other German territories. It would have been a more settled argument if they used the 14 points which were general and not bias. they could have made it better by more countries could have helped pay for the damage because all of the countries took part in this war. international disarmament, free trade, an international legal system, and collective security. Wilson believed war could be eliminated from the world with democracy, self-determination of rule for all nations, open diplomacy, This also could have been improved because the treaty of Versailles only blamed one country.
<span>Eliminativism is based on the belief
that race is not biological</span>
Naturalism on the other hand is based
on the notion that race is biological
Constructivism is based on the notion
that race is real, but only socially construed as it is based on social factors.
1. I choose the Emancipation proclamation.
The basis for a democratic country is the guarantee of human rights for all of its citizens and allowing all citizens the right to participate in the government.
Freeing other humans from slavery indicates his will to truly bring equality for all people int he nations, because he knew that slavery robbed the very essence of human rights from the people together with their dignity.
2. I compared it with Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus allow prisoners to report unlawful treatment when they're in their sentence. Indeed this represent Lincoln' willingness to preserve human rights, but the impact is nowhere near the Emancipation of Slavery that affect millions of human beings.
3. I belive Barrack Obama would be a good example.
Despite his blunder in adressing several economic issues in united states, General population believe that Obama always tried his best in perserving human rights and democracy. (could be seen by programs such as HAPA that give the right for children that born in united states by non-citizzens the right to be a legal citizen)
Lower courts handle the more minor cases that are presented in society on a common basis. Usually these cases get solved or handled faster.
While the higher courts handle the cases that require higher powers and judgment makers. These cases of course go on for years due to many reasons so they take longer to handle.
Please Vote my answer brainliest thanks!
