Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, critical thinking refers to the process under which an individual or an entity analyse and evaluate their objectives with the intent of forming a judgement for then purpose.
In the given case, joey has a wide variety of alternatives to choose to how to perform then task and the supervisor will form judgement about his work on the basis of the choices he made for the work assigned.
Answer:
Tells us we need to download something, sorry mate.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. Less than the effective interest rate
Explanation:
The stated discount rate on this loan is Less than the effective interest rate
As the note is noninterest-bearing note, the stated discount rate on this loan is less than the effective interest rate.
Answer:
d.the levels of activity for non-unit based cost drivers remain the same.
Explanation:
In the case of conventional and activity based costing calculations, the output should be similar to the activity levels that belong to the non-unit in which the cost driver should remain the same
Thus as per the given scenario, the option d is correct
And, the rest of the options seems incorrect
