Answer:
answer bottom is 90
Step-by-step explanation:
i helps
Flip 33/5
3/5 times 5/33
3 times 5 /5 times 33
15/165
Reduce
1/11
Answer:
Do you want to be extremely boring?
Since the value is 2 at both 0 and 1, why not make it so the value is 2 everywhere else?
is a valid solution.
Want something more fun? Why not a parabola?
.
At this point you have three parameters to play with, and from the fact that
we can already fix one of them, in particular
. At this point I would recommend picking an easy value for one of the two, let's say
(or even
, it will just flip everything upside down) and find out b accordingly:
Our function becomes
Notice that it works even by switching sign in the first two terms: 
Want something even more creative? Try playing with a cosine tweaking it's amplitude and frequency so that it's period goes to 1 and it's amplitude gets to 2: 
Since cosine is bound between -1 and 1, in order to reach the maximum at 2 we need
, and at that point the first condition is guaranteed; using the second to find k we get 

Or how about a sine wave that oscillates around 2? with a similar reasoning you get

Sky is the limit.
Answer:
Now we can calculate the p value based on the alternative hypothesis with this probability:
The p value is very low compared to the significance level of
then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of people liberal is higher than 0.24
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=200 represent the random sample taken
X=75 represent the number of people Liberal
estimated proportion of people liberal
is the value that we want to test
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to verify if the true proportion of adults liberal is higher than 0.24:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
Now we can calculate the p value based on the alternative hypothesis with this probability:
The p value is very low compared to the significance level of
then we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of people liberal is higher than 0.24