<u>Answer:
</u>
Supreme Court's decision reinforced the idea of federal supremacy which said that the national government had higher authority than the states.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Constitution of the United States, for several reasons like that of safeguarding of national and integrity, dispenses more power and authority to the federal government so that it can not only supervise the functioning of the state governments but also cease them from making laws that do not comply with the federal laws of the constitution.
- The Supreme Court's decision clarified that the Constitution enumerates the federal government to be supreme in the comparison of powers between the state and the federal governments.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Coaches of professional sports teams plan strategy and players execute that strategy in games.
Explanation:
Division of labor refers to a situation where a specific job is given to more than one person to carry out. In all human activities in a society, there is an iota of a division of labor and this is so that there will be a smooth running of things to yield good and fast results. There is a division of labor in the restaurant, in an organization, at school, etc.
This how you identify the presence of a division of labor. For instance, in the construction of a building, 50 workers are having their separate duties concerning one job. One is in charge of mixing building materials, another is in charge of fixing the blocks and so on.
Given the above, option A is the answer.
Answer: win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol.
Explanation: Bill is twenty-five years which is above the alcohol consumption age. However, if Bill uncle now refuses to pay Bill as agreed. The uncle claims that because Bill suffered no detriment by refraining from alcohol, and that because his non-drinking did not constitute consideration, no contract was formed. If Bill sues his uncle, Bill will win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol at that age.
Answer:
This illustrates: <u>Overreliance on anecdotes.</u>
Explanation:
What Dr McDonald is using to validate and support his treatment for ADHD are mearly anecdotes, which are not sufficient enough in the scientific field. To justufy a practice or a treatment a professional should consider a theory that has been accurate and has prove of its results.
Overreliance on anecdotes means putting all the justification of the validity of a treatment, only over people´s testimony.
