There are several answers to this question, but one reason diversity in the US contributed to isolationist sentiment was that there was a large German population in the US.
The entry of the US was the defining moment of the conflict, since it made made the eventual defeat of Germany possible. It had been predicted in 1916 that assuming the US did battle, the Partners' tactical exertion against Germany would be maintained by U.S. supplies and by gigantic augmentations of credit. These assumptions were adequately and definitively satisfied. The US's development of deadly implements was to address not exclusively its own issues yet in addition France's and Great Britain's. In this sense, the American financial commitment alone was unequivocal. By April 1, 1917, the Partners had depleted their method for paying for fundamental supplies from the US, and it is challenging to perceive how they might have kept up with the conflict exertion assuming the US had stayed nonpartisan. American advances to the Allies worth $7,000,000,000 among 1917 and the finish of the conflict kept up with the progression of U.S. arms and food across the Atlantic.
Know more about US involvement in WW1 - brainly.com/question/468741
#SPJ4
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "A. a two term limit." The answer does not present a legacy of Abraham Lincoln. Other legacies he left is to abolish slavery and re-unification of the United States after the civil war. It also includes expanded presidential war powers, the presidential debates, <span>emancipation and the Thirteenth Amendment</span>