Louis Napoleon Bonaparte's seizure of power was the product of just another coup de etat. One of his guiding principles is found in his deep belief in the power of the middle class and its nationalist connotations with some similarities to the social policies of Bismarck.
Louis was mainly supported by the low classes, the peasants, He used his mandate to abolish the recently created representative assembly, in order to marginalize the liberal factions, finally becoming himself a new emperor in the second middle of the IX th century. Shortly after being in power he restored universal suffrage.
On the other hand: Bismarck’s realpolitik policies were employed in response to the failed revolutions of 1848 as a way of strengthening the state system and tighten social order. As the most famous advocate of Realpolitik, Otto became the first Chancellor, serving in the Kingdom of Prussia. The use of Realpolitik had him achieve Prussian dominance in Germany. Manipulating political issues causing antagonism in other countries and causing or engaging in wars if necessary, "the end justified the means".
Capital city of Azerbaijan
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. The factor that led to the success of the Mughal Empire would be that they <span>invaded a land, took the wealth, and left the people to govern themselves. Hope this answers the question.
</span>
It goes both ways. A full on invansion of Japan would’ve costed a lot of lives perhaps more than the bomb killed but on the other hand many innocent lives were lost with the dropping of the bomb
Look on quizlet man. Trust me.
