What is the length and the width you need those to answer the question
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
The larger number is 69 and the smaller number is 35.
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the equations. Here x will be the larger number and y will be the smaller number.
x + y = 104
x = 2y -1
Substitute:
(2y -1) + y = 104
3y = 105
y = 35
x = 2(35) - 1
x = 70 - 1
x = 69
The larger number is 69 and the smaller number is 35.
Given:
y varies directly with x,
It is given that y = 7 when x = -9.
To find:
The value of y when x = 27 for the direct variation.
Solution:
It is given that y varies directly with x, so
...(i)
Where, k is the constant of proportionality.
It is given that y = 7 when x = -9. Putting these values in (i), we get
Putting 
in (i), we get
Putting 
, we get
Therefore, the required value is .
