A famous elm tree that stood in boston
Answer:
c. temporal precedence
Explanation:
Temporal precedence is one among the three criterias that leads to a cause and effect relationship.
A temporal precedence entails that the criteria for assessing causation is that the causal variable must Precede the effect it is supposed
to cause.
This simply implies that the cause must come before the effect.
Hence, Mida trying to ensure that the cause of low grade was because of social, and making sure that social media comes before low grade. This is putting the cause of the low grade before the effect.
Therefore, the experiment is an example of temporal precedence research.
Answer:
The following are some of the differences between industrial cities and pre industrial cities.
Explanation:
- In industrial cities, each phase of production is carried out by specialists while in pre-industrial cities each phase is carried out by craftsmen
- Pre-industrial cities are congested while industrial cities are not.
- Industrial cities embrace modern transportation facilities while pre-industrial cities use primitive transportation technology.
- Pre-industrial cities use primitive sources of energy while industrial cities embrace modern energy sources.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.