Over the next five centuries the economy would at first grow and then suffer an acute crisis, resulting in significant political and economic change. Despite economic dislocation in urban and extraction economies, including shifts in the holders of wealth and the location of these economies, the economic output of towns and mines developed and intensified over the period.[2] By the end of the period, England had a weak government, by later standards, overseeing an economy dominated by rented farms controlled by gentry, and a thriving community of indigenous English merchants and corporations.[3]
Los I think sorry if it's wrong!
The macrosociological viewpoint is more beneficial since it describes how massive social institutions affect people on a personal level.
When comparing the two, the main distinction is that while macro sociology focuses on larger social systems and structures, micro sociology deals with smaller-scale human interactions.
<h3>What is a macrosociological perspective?</h3>
Macro sociologists concentrate on the overall situation, which often includes social structure, social institutions, and social, political, and economic change. They examine the expansive social dynamics that impact people's lives and the development of human society.
For more details about macrosociological to refer link
brainly.com/question/3189558
#SPJ4
