Answer:
French + Indian War
Stamp Act
Townshend Acts
Boston Massacre
Committees of Correspondence
Boston Tea Party
Answer:
The Gallipoli campaign
Explanation:
The Allies wanted to control the Dardanelles to attack the Ottoman Empire. The Allies wished to take control of the Dardanelles Strait so that it would be open for their naval power to break through into the Sea of Marmara and threaten Constantinople.
Many countries fought in the Gallipoli campaign including Britain, Australia, New Zealand, France, and India. The Gallipoli campaign was a defeat for the Allies. It is estimated that about 27,000 French and 115,000 from British, Australia, New Zealand, and India killed.
As I understand it, Laissez-faire ideology maintains that the "free market" is the best way to determine what businesses can and should do. This means that businesses, in competition with one another, should be free to determine their paths free from any government rules or regulations. The belief is that the competition among various businesses will ultimately result in the best outcomes for society in general - Adam Smith's "invisible hand". As part of this philosophy, workers should also be free to compete with each other and choose to work wherever they wish and this process will also result in the best results for the workers as well.
However, isn't there a huge assumption in this philosophy? Doesn't the whole justification of this belief depends on the condition that there is perfect competition and that any company and any worker have the equal ability to compete with one another?
What if there is no perfect competition? What if some companies have advantages - due to any of a whole array of reasons - that place them in a non-competitive position vis a vis their competitors? Without perfect competition then other companies are not necessarily able to compete with other companies that have certain advantages. If such a situation exists, then advantaged companies may have the ability to pursue a course that results in their private benefit, but not necessarily to the benefit of society as a whole. The same would apply to workers in that reduced competition among companies would result in decreased leverage for potential employees.
To recap, if the Laissez-faire ideology maintains the best economic policy for society as a whole, and it depends on there being perfect competition on an ongoing basis with minimal government intervention, doesn't it fall apart if there is less than the perfect competition?
Just because I’m not sure what is the answer just trying to get these points
This letter was written by Leo Szilard, a Hungarian-German-American physicist and signed by Albert Einstein on August 2, 1939. In this letter he urged the president to get involve on a nuclear research and project as Germany might be planning and developing an atomic bomb.
