The correct answer is False
Explanation:
Primary sources always reflect the perspective of those who lived or witnessed a specific event; for example, letters written by a soldier in combat about the first world war are considered as a primary source. Therefore, a primary source is a first-hand account, not an interpreted source.
On the other hand, secondary and tertiary sources are those created by others using primary sources or secondary sources, this means they show the interpretation of others, and due to this, information might be inaccurate. This implies secondary and tertiary sources are those that had been interpreted, and therefore the statement is false because primary sources had not been interpreted; also, these are preferred by researches due to this reason.
I'm pretty sure the last one is incorrect as it become a constitution monarchy not a ruling power of England.
Hughes developed a(n)derisive tone in “salvation”
Answer:
Both immediate and longer term industry responses to the security failures related to transportation showed
that various security holes existed between businesses in transportation chains from all modes and that many
transportation businesses were unaware of how other links in their chain handled safety issues, or if they did at all.
The regulation concerns areas that present safety concerns and may cause loss of life.
The inability of players in transportation chains to identify who was handling safety issues and how they were handling them
highlights a need for clarification of duties and roles within the industry.
The
investigation of the 9/11 events have further highlighted widespread and serious security flaws in the transportation
industry, such as the lack of regulation of flight schools and the use of water transportation to ship potentially lethal
items such as explosives. Unfortunately, the various security precautions that have placed a financial burden on
transportation companies change frequently and are often ineffective.
