Industrialization went hand in hand with democratic institutions and respect for private property. To the extent working people constituted a unified block of voters, they had to be listened to.
<span>Now, let me ask you a question: What does your question really ask? That is to say, what do you mean by "the major industrial nations of the west"? In what way are they different from the "working people" who live in them? Or, do you think that all John D. Rockefeller did was sit around all day and let money flow into his pocket like honey from a pot? Guys like E.H. Harriman worked very, very hard. So, does your question really make any sense?</span>
I’m pretty sure the answer is D :)
<span>When an individual is expressing their opinions or beliefs in a forceful and somewhat hostile manner when communicating with others, this person is engaging in aggressive behavior. This is due to the fact that it is not threatening, but it is very forward.</span>
Chiefdoms are similar to bands and tribes in that they are organized by kinship and descent; however, chiefdoms are similar to states in that they have differential access to resources.
<h3>What are Chiefdoms?</h3>
- In non-industrial societies, a chiefdom is a type of hierarchical political system that is typically based on kinship and where formal authority is monopolized by the rightful senior members of specific families or "houses."
- In relation to the wider population, these elites constitute a political-ideological aristocracy.
- A chiefdom is described as a type of social organization in anthropological theory that is more complicated than a tribe or a band society and less complex than a state or a civilization.
- This model of human social development is based on theories of cultural evolution.
- The concentration of power and endemic inequality are traits of chiefdoms. There are at least two inherited social classes, the elite and the commoner.
To learn more about Chiefdoms refer to:
brainly.com/question/12257612
#SPJ4
