Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data: -decreases the experiment's reliability and validity - wastes time and resources - destroys the scientist's credibility in their field - may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design - is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise Explanation: There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
I’m assuming the six kingdoms of life, but yes they do have a very large purpose for providing characteristics to bacteria, animals, fungi, humans, etc.
