Answer:
Rivercity Coffee Shop
Chad cannot sue Jose. The $10,000 is paid to Jose is a bribe. Since a bribe is not legal, it cannot form the basis for an enforceable contract.
Moreover, the offer by Chad is an antitrust and anti-competition consideration that is legally frowned upon. illegal contract
Explanation:
For a contract to be enforceable, it cannot be illegal. A bribe is illegal. The basis for the contract is illegal. Therefore, Chad cannot sue Jose. Since Jose decided to breach the contract, neither Chad nor Jose is entitled to any compensation. Jose cannot be held liable for non-performance.
Since Drea is facing an ethical dilemma and she wants to have the best option to her ethical dilemma, for the second step, she wouls have to: Identify feasible options. Option b.
<h3>What is an ethical dilemma?</h3>
In philosophy, ethical dilemmas—also known as ethical paradoxes or moral dilemmas—arise when an agent must choose between two competing moral obligations, none of which takes precedence. A definition that is similarly comparable describes ethical situations as ones where there is no right decision to be made.
An ethical problem, also known as a moral problem or ethical paradox, arises when a person must choose between two possibilities, none of which are wholly ethically acceptable.
An ethical conflict is an opposition between two morally righteous actions. A disagreement exists between two values or principles. The problem is that by choosing one correct action, you will invalidate the other right course because you would be acting both rightly and wrongly at the same moment.
Read more on ethical dilemma here: brainly.com/question/3838938
#SPJ1
is a discount that buyers can receive in exchange
Answer:
Thomas capital
Equipment $30,000
Inventory 25,000
Cash <u> 45,000</u>
Total <u> 100,000</u>
Explanation:
Equipment : thebook value is $25,000 while the market value is $30,000. the market value of the equipment will be used.
Inventory : the book value is $50,000 while the market value is $25,000. As a result of obsolescence, the inventory will be value at lower of cost and net realizable value(IAS2). therefore, $25,000 will be recognized for the inventory in the determination of Thomas capital
Cash: there is no changes in cash contributed.
Answer
The company should sell XY as it is because processing it further would reduce its income by $(33,000)
Explanation
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost.
</em>
Product A $
Additional revenue ( 31 -26)× 6,600 33,000
Further processing cost (10× 6600) <u> ( 66,000)</u>
Loss from further processing (100) <u>(33,000)</u>
