<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
Answer:
<em>precios de productos y servicios</em>
Explanation:
El PIB de un país aumenta cuando el valor total de los productos y servicios que los productores nacionales venden a países extranjeros excede el valor total de los bienes y servicios extranjeros que compran los consumidores nacionales. <em>Estos productos y servicios son las variables internas y pueden variar desde alimentos, facturas de servicios públicos e incluso el pago de una sesión de masaje.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is: when buyers and sellers have influence on price.
Explanation:
The imperfect market situations exist when there are few buyers or sellers such that they are able to influence the market. For instance, in a perfectly competitive market, there is a large number of buyers and sellers. So, any single buyer or seller is not able to influence the market. The price and output are determined by the market forces.
In an imperfect market such as monopoly or oligopoly, few firms exist so they are able to fix output and price on their own.
<span>Institutions that support economic growth are the ones that provide incentives for entrepreneurs to take risks and innovate. Innovation is the key factor for the economic growth. in keeping the market demand and economic growth innovation plays a major role. innovation can be done by introducing new ideas and new working methods.</span>
Consolidation Rules Under GAAP
The general rule requires consolidation of financial statements when one company’s ownership interest in a business provides it with A MAJORITY OF the voting power- meaning it controls more then 50% of the voting shares