The early sociologists that laid the foundations for the discipline of sociology would be :
- Emile Durkheim,
- Saint simon
- Max Weber
- C Wright Mills
- Karl Max
hope this helps
Myanmar, formerly known as Burma until 1989, had been squeezed by international economic sanctions since the late 1990s, with only China as a major political backer and investor.
Answer:He has a disorder known as hemophilia.
Explanation:
Hemophilia is a non common disorder that causes your blood not to clot normally due to the lack of blood clotting proteins.
If you get involved in an accident you may bleed more than usual however the most concern with this condition is the fact that a person can suffer from internal bleeding if their case of hemophilia is severe.
Internal bleeding may have an impact on your organs or be life-threatening.
Hemophilia is a genetic disorder which means it can be pass from your parents to you .
How is it treated ?
It is treated by regularly minimising the replacement of a specific clotting factor.
Symptoms
Symptoms depends on whether your case is severe or mild
If is severe you will bleed heavily and constant but if it is mild it happens only in few times.
One will bleed severely after surgery or dental work , more than a normal person would bleed .
Nose bleeds without being hurt by anything , swelling joints,large and deep bruises and heavy constant bleeding after vaccination.
blood in your urine or stool.
Answer:
The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks. The beating nearly killed Sumner and it contributed significantly to the country's polarization over the issue of slavery. It has been considered symbolic of the "breakdown of reasoned discourse"[1] and the use of violence that eventually led to the Civil War.
Explanation:
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
