The corridor is the vertical section of the supply curve of reserves in the federal fund market.
Adirondack Marketing Inc.'s Factory Overhead per unit of Product A is <em>d. </em><em>$222.09</em><em> per unit.</em>
Data and Calculations:
Overhead Total Direct Labor Hours DLH per Product
A B
Painting Dept. $251,700 10,200 9 5
Finishing Dept. 61,700 11,900 5 6
Totals $313,400 22,100 14 11
The overhead rate for a unit of Product A in the <u>Painting Department</u> = Total overhead in the Painting Department divided by Direct Labor Hours, multiplied by <em>direct labor hours per unit</em> of Product A.
= $222.09 ($251,700/10,200 x 9)
Thus, for a unit of Product A, the overhead rate in the <u>Painting Department</u> is $222.09.
Learn more about overhead allocation at brainly.com/question/14095583
Answer:
We have to find the value of Larry's investement before and after the issue of new shares, to see if Larry's worries are justified.
The current value of Larry's investment is:
2,000 x $41.00 = $82,000
To find the value of Larry's investment if the new shares are issued, we use the following formula:
Investment = ¨[[(Oustanding shares x price per share) + (New issue of shares x price per share)]/ Outsanding shares + new issue] x No. of shares held
Investment = [[(20,000 x 41.00) + (5,000 x 32.80)] / 20,000 + 50,000] x 2,000
Investment = 39.36 x 2,000
Investment = $78,720
Thus, if the new shares were issued, Larry's investment value in the company would fall from $82,000 to $78,720, confirming his reasons to be worried.
Answer:
The vertical analysis based on net sales would show 45.94% and 74.13% for cost of goods sold.
Explanation:
Vertical Analysis: The vertical analysis does the analysis of the financial statements which is based on the sales value.
In mathematically,
Vertical Analysis = Financial Statement item ÷ sales value × 100
So,
For the cost of good sold. the vertical analysis would be:
For the Latest amount of cost of good sold:
= Latest amount of cost of goods sold ÷ Latest sales value × 100
= $17,000 ÷ $37,000 × 100
= 45.94%
For the updated amount of cost of goods sold:
= updated amount of cost of goods sold ÷ updated sales value × 100
= $43,000 ÷ $58,000 × 100
= 74.13%
Hence, the vertical analysis based on net sales would show 45.94% and 74.13% for the cost of goods sold.
Answer:
a. $ 90,000 cost decrease
Explanation:
The computation in the change in the amount of differential cost is shown below:
= (Unit cost by ignoring the fixed cost) - (unit cost to manufacturing the purchase cost) × number of units purchased
= ($12 - $15) × 30,000 units
= $3 × 30,000 units
= $90,000 decrease
And the other information which is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
