Social mobility in the u.s. does not depend on where one starts in the class system anthropolgy

1 answer:

6 0

The statement above is TRUE.
Social mobility refers to the movement of individuals or families within or between social strata in a particular society. It means a change in social status relative to one's present location with a given society. Social mobility in US does not depend on where one start in the class system; one can come from the lowest class strata and become one of the richest individual and an individual from a very rich family can also end up as a p.auper. A lot of factors come to play in these situations.

You might be interested in

Qriosity inc. comes out with a new antivirus program and prices it at half price to attract buyers. the company is using _______

Talja [164]

The company is using market-penetration pricing.

6 0

3 years ago

_____ are dedicated to promoting human behaviors and industry decisions that are environmentally responsible.

ElenaW [278]

Green careers ...................

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The existence of different age groups within a company's target markets is referred to as

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

multigenerationalism.

Explanation:

Multigenerationalism is the term used to describe Marketing to different generations.

Only a few products will appeal to all age groups. A company will develop a variety of products to attract diverse age groups. A Single product firm or one with few products may differentiate its goods or services to appeal to a wider target. Multigenerationalism exists when a business has different age groups in its target market.

5 0

3 years ago

What does the cio in a company do

Mars2501 [29]

Manage the technological areas of the company

8 0

3 years ago

Fundamental analysis determines that the price of a firm's stock is too low, given its intrinsic value. The information used in

Allisa [31]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": Neglected-firm effect.

Explanation:

The Neglected-firm effect has the purpose to explain why small companies that are not well-known have better performances than the ones that are. The theory explains that smaller companies' stocks generate higher returns because they are unlikely to be studied by market analysis. In that sense, because no much information is provided by the smaller firms -even lesser than what is required by law, they are neglected by analysts since there are very few data to take a look at.

8 0

2 years ago